Plant varieties protection

Dr. Aleksey V. Zalesov

Deputy Managing Partner
Head of Legal Department
Phone

Fax:
+7 (495) 221 8880
+7 (495) 221 8881
+7 (495) 221 8885
+7 (495) 221 8886
  • Holds Ph.D. degree in Law;
  • Master’s degree of the Moscow State Academy of Law, lawyer, specialist in Civil Law;
  • Diploma of the Moscow Engineering Physics Institute, engineer – physicist;
  • Diploma of the Russian State Institute of Intellectual Property, patent expert;
  • Patent and Trademark Attorney of the Russian Federation (inventions, utility models, industrial designs, trademarks, appellations of origin of goods);
  • Eurasian Patent Attorney;
  • Experience of work in the Ministry of Foreign Economical Relations of Russian Federation;
  • Experience of work in the Trade Mission of the Russian Federation in the USA, skilled in dealing with American firms in the field of intellectual property, representation of the interests of large Russian companies in the USA;
  • Experience in the field of registration of the objects of intellectual property in Russia and abroad;
  • Experience in the presenting interests of clients in courts and administrative bodies;
  • President of the Russian National Group of the AIPPI;
  • Arbitration assessor of the Court of Arbitration for Economic Disputes of Chamber of Commerce and Industry of the Russian Federation;
  • Member of AIPPI, LES, Russian Patent Attorneys Association;
  • With Sojuzpatent since 2001;
  • Language – English, Spanish. 
Company news
May 25 2017

Sojuzpatent’s team of ten professionals took part in the 139th INTA Annual Meeting in Barcelona, Spain. During the event, Sojuzpatent hosted a booth at the Convention Center.

Read more
Apr 28 2017

The Supreme Court of the Russian Federation refused to transfer the cassation appeal of the offender to the Judicial Board for Economic Disputes, thereby supporting the position of Sojuzpatent’s client - Renault S.A.S. (France)

Read more
Nov 29 2016

On November 28, 2016, the Presidium of the IP Court canceled the decision of the first instance in the case SIP-70/2016 and sent the case back for a new trial by a different panel of judges. The Presidium agreed with the arguments of Golden Lady Company S.p.A that the conclusions of the court of the first instance contradicted to the facts and case materials and that additional evidence, provided by the parties after administrative procedure, should be also taken into consideration by court. Also, the Presidium stated, that a Power of Attorney should clearly indicate the date when it is signed, and if a Notary just acknowledges the authentic signature, but does not confirm that this signature was put in his presence, the date of notarial certification cannot be the date of PoA. A PoA without a date is void. A power of attorney, having two different dates on it should be also considered void.

Read more

Read all news ї