Trademarks, appellations of origin of goods

      The trademark attorneys of Sojuzpatent on behalf of their clients render the services on registration of trademarks (service marks), appellations of origin of goods in Russia and abroad both under the procedure established by the Madrid Agreement (international application) according to the provisions of the Paris Convention for the Protection of Industrial Property (conventional application) and under the national procedure.

        The regularly updated data base forming part of Sojuzpatent’s software comprises of the information on the registered and claimed for registration in the Russian Federation trademarks (service marks) enabling our specialists to conduct the search of the claimed designation and to provide the clients with the necessary facts, in particular to reveal in automatic regime trademarks registrations being identical or confusingly similar to the trademarks registered in the names of the Sojuzpatent’s clients.

        Sojuzpatent is experienced in handling the matters concerning the legal protection of well-known trademarks and is able to conduct the sociological poll in order to obtain the results necessary for documenting proof of the designation notability.



Legal address:
5/2, Il`inka str.,
Moscow, Russia, 109012

Post address:
h.13, b.5, Myasnitskaya str.
Moscow, Russia, 101000

+7 (495) 221-88-80, 221-88-81

+7 (495) 221-88-85, 221-88-86


Company news
May 25 2017

Sojuzpatent’s team of ten professionals took part in the 139th INTA Annual Meeting in Barcelona, Spain. During the event, Sojuzpatent hosted a booth at the Convention Center.

Read more
Apr 28 2017

The Supreme Court of the Russian Federation refused to transfer the cassation appeal of the offender to the Judicial Board for Economic Disputes, thereby supporting the position of Sojuzpatent’s client - Renault S.A.S. (France)

Read more
Nov 29 2016

On November 28, 2016, the Presidium of the IP Court canceled the decision of the first instance in the case SIP-70/2016 and sent the case back for a new trial by a different panel of judges. The Presidium agreed with the arguments of Golden Lady Company S.p.A that the conclusions of the court of the first instance contradicted to the facts and case materials and that additional evidence, provided by the parties after administrative procedure, should be also taken into consideration by court. Also, the Presidium stated, that a Power of Attorney should clearly indicate the date when it is signed, and if a Notary just acknowledges the authentic signature, but does not confirm that this signature was put in his presence, the date of notarial certification cannot be the date of PoA. A PoA without a date is void. A power of attorney, having two different dates on it should be also considered void.

Read more

Read all news ї