Sojuzpatent Takes Part in AIPPI World Congress 2016

Sep 16 2016

Alexey Zalesov and Irina Ozolina from Sojuzpatent took part in annual AIPPI Word Congress 2016 in Milano from September 16 to 20 as representative of the Russian national group of AIPPI. The Congress this year ended up in working out six resolutions rather than usual four:

-                     Added matter: the standard for determining adequate support for amendments;

-                     Security Interests over Intellectual Property;

-                     Requirements for protection of designs;

-                     Linking and making available on the Internet;

-                     Publication of Patent Applications;

-                     Patent Rights and Green Technology/ Climate Change.

As usual, the Congress covered the themes topical for all the jurisdictions (patents and pharma, IP and Food, IP and Fashion, patenting computer-based technologies), but also gave some possibilities to discuss some matters more localized, although in view of Global Market interesting for all the participants (Brexit and IP, TTP and IP, etc.).


Legal address:
5/2, Il`inka str.,
Moscow, Russia, 109012

Post address:
h.13, b.5, Myasnitskaya str.
Moscow, Russia, 101000

+7 (495) 221-88-80, 221-88-81

+7 (495) 221-88-85, 221-88-86


Company news
May 25 2017

Sojuzpatent’s team of ten professionals took part in the 139th INTA Annual Meeting in Barcelona, Spain. During the event, Sojuzpatent hosted a booth at the Convention Center.

Read more
Apr 28 2017

The Supreme Court of the Russian Federation refused to transfer the cassation appeal of the offender to the Judicial Board for Economic Disputes, thereby supporting the position of Sojuzpatent’s client - Renault S.A.S. (France)

Read more
Nov 29 2016

On November 28, 2016, the Presidium of the IP Court canceled the decision of the first instance in the case SIP-70/2016 and sent the case back for a new trial by a different panel of judges. The Presidium agreed with the arguments of Golden Lady Company S.p.A that the conclusions of the court of the first instance contradicted to the facts and case materials and that additional evidence, provided by the parties after administrative procedure, should be also taken into consideration by court. Also, the Presidium stated, that a Power of Attorney should clearly indicate the date when it is signed, and if a Notary just acknowledges the authentic signature, but does not confirm that this signature was put in his presence, the date of notarial certification cannot be the date of PoA. A PoA without a date is void. A power of attorney, having two different dates on it should be also considered void.

Read more

Read all news ї