Court for Intellectual Property Rights Rules in Favor of Sojuzpatents Client Open Joint-Stock Company Obninskiy Kolbasniy Zavod

Apr 13 2016

The Court for Intellectual Property Rights ruled in favor of Sojuzpatent’s client – Joint-Stock Company “Obninskiy Kolbasniy Zavod” in a case on recovery of compensation in the amount of 2 859 910 rubles for  infringement of Russian trademark No. 242227. The Court upheld the Decision of the Moscow Arbitration Court and the Ruling of the Twentieth Appeal Court on the same case according to which the claims of the Open Joint-Stock Company "Cherkizovsky Myasopererabatyvajushiy Zavod" to Open Joint-Stock Company “Obninskiy Kolbasniy Zavod” were rejected.

Legal address:
5/2, Il`inka str.,
Moscow, Russia, 109012

Post address:
h.13, b.5, Myasnitskaya str.
Moscow, Russia, 101000

+7 (495) 221-88-80, 221-88-81

+7 (495) 221-88-85, 221-88-86


Company news
May 25 2017

Sojuzpatent’s team of ten professionals took part in the 139th INTA Annual Meeting in Barcelona, Spain. During the event, Sojuzpatent hosted a booth at the Convention Center.

Read more
Apr 28 2017

The Supreme Court of the Russian Federation refused to transfer the cassation appeal of the offender to the Judicial Board for Economic Disputes, thereby supporting the position of Sojuzpatent’s client - Renault S.A.S. (France)

Read more
Nov 29 2016

On November 28, 2016, the Presidium of the IP Court canceled the decision of the first instance in the case SIP-70/2016 and sent the case back for a new trial by a different panel of judges. The Presidium agreed with the arguments of Golden Lady Company S.p.A that the conclusions of the court of the first instance contradicted to the facts and case materials and that additional evidence, provided by the parties after administrative procedure, should be also taken into consideration by court. Also, the Presidium stated, that a Power of Attorney should clearly indicate the date when it is signed, and if a Notary just acknowledges the authentic signature, but does not confirm that this signature was put in his presence, the date of notarial certification cannot be the date of PoA. A PoA without a date is void. A power of attorney, having two different dates on it should be also considered void.

Read more

Read all news