News

Dec 7 2010
December 7, 2010 Moscow Central Convention Hall “EXPOCENTER” hosted the Second International Forum on Intellectual Property “ExpoPriority”, in which Aleksey Zalesov, Ph.D., Registered Patent Attorney, Deputy General Director, Head of Legal Department of Sojuzpatent participated as the Chairman of the section "Legal Protection of Means of Individualisation". December 7, 2010 Moscow Central Convention Hall “EXPOCENTER” hosted the Second International Forum on Intellectual Property “ExpoPriority”, in which Aleksey Zalesov, Ph.D., Registered Patent Attorney, Deputy General Director, Head of Legal Department of Sojuzpatent participated as the Chairman of the section "Legal Protection of Means of Individualisation".
Dec 2 2010
December 2, 2010 – December 5, 2010 the Annual BRIC IP Forum “The Challenges of Securing Intellectual Property Rights in Emerging Markets” was held in Rio-de-Janeiro (Brazil). Sojuzpatent’s employees Dr. Zalesov and Dr. Isaev pariticipated in this Forum. December 2, 2010 – December 5, 2010 the Annual BRIC IP Forum “The Challenges of Securing Intellectual Property Rights in Emerging Markets” was held in Rio-de-Janeiro (Brazil). Sojuzpatent’s employees Dr. Zalesov and Dr. Isaev pariticipated in this Forum.
Nov 29 2010
November 29, 2010 the Appeal Arbitration Court for Ninth Circuit ruled in favor of Sojuzpatent’s client SOREMARTEC S.A. (Belgium) (Plaintiff) and affirmed the Decision of the Moscow Arbitration Court as of July 9, 2010 according to which the claims of SOREMARTEC S.A. are fully satisfied and the Defendant is obliged to stop violation of the exclusive rights for the trademark under the international registration No 798984 by way of stopping the sale of biscuits “PRALINKI COCONUT LUX”. November 29, 2010 the Appeal Arbitration Court for Ninth Circuit ruled in favor of Sojuzpatent’s client SOREMARTEC S.A. (Belgium) (Plaintiff) and affirmed the Decision of the Moscow Arbitration Court as of July 9, 2010 according to which the claims of SOREMARTEC S.A. are fully satisfied and the Defendant is obliged to stop violation of the exclusive rights for the trademark under the international registration No 798984 by way of stopping the sale of biscuits “PRALINKI COCONUT LUX”.
Nov 26 2010
November 26, 2010 The Chamber for the Patent Disputes of the Russian Federal Service for Intellectual Property, Patents and Trademarks issued a decision to satisfy the objection of Sojuzpatent’s client LLC “Kia Motors Rus” against the grant of a patent RF ą 83976 "Mechanism for transferring electrical signals and return of the lever blinker indicator. Patent RU 83976 is invalidated completely due to the discrepancy of the utility model to the condition of patentability “novelty”, established by art. 1351 of the Civil Code of the Russian Federation. The utility model is not new, because the sum of its essential features at the priority date was known from the prior art, namely from the information about the use by LLC “Kia Motors Rus" in the Russian Federation of means of the same purpose as the claimed utility model. November 26, 2010 The Chamber for the Patent Disputes of the Russian Federal Service for Intellectual Property, Patents and Trademarks issued a decision to satisfy the objection of Sojuzpatent’s client LLC “Kia Motors Rus” against the grant of a patent RF ą 83976 "Mechanism for transferring electrical signals and return of the lever blinker indicator. Patent RU 83976 is invalidated completely due to the discrepancy of the utility model to the condition of patentability “novelty”, established by art. 1351 of the Civil Code of the Russian Federation. The utility model is not new, because the sum of its essential features at the priority date was known from the prior art, namely from the information about the use by LLC “Kia Motors Rus" in the Russian Federation of means of the same purpose as the claimed utility model.
Nov 17 2010
November 17, 2010 - The Chamber for the Patent Disputes of the Russian Federal Service for Intellectual Property, Patents and Trademarks (RUPTO) issued a decision to satisfy the objection of Sojuzpatent’s client LLC “Kia Motors Rus” against the grant of patent RU 36274 for the utility model “Leaf material”. Patent RU 36274 is invalidated completely due to the discrepancy of the utility model to the condition of patentability “novelty”, established by art. 5 of the Patent Law of the Russian Federation. The utility model is not new, because the sum of its essential features at the priority date was known from the prior art, namely from the information about the use by LLC “Kia Motors Rus" in the Russian Federation of means of the same purpose as the claimed utility model. November 17, 2010 - The Chamber for the Patent Disputes of the Russian Federal Service for Intellectual Property, Patents and Trademarks (RUPTO) issued a decision to satisfy the objection of Sojuzpatent’s client LLC “Kia Motors Rus” against the grant of patent RU 36274 for the utility model “Leaf material”. Patent RU 36274 is invalidated completely due to the discrepancy of the utility model to the condition of patentability “novelty”, established by art. 5 of the Patent Law of the Russian Federation. The utility model is not new, because the sum of its essential features at the priority date was known from the prior art, namely from the information about the use by LLC “Kia Motors Rus" in the Russian Federation of means of the same purpose as the claimed utility model.
Oct 20 2010
October 20, 2010 the Moscow Arbitration Court decided in favor of Sojuzpatent’s client company “RICHTER GEDEON NYRT” (Hungary) (third person) to refuse to satisfy the statement of claim of Les Laboratoires Servier (France) against Federal Service for Intellectual Property, Patents and Trademarks (RUPTO) about the invalidation in part of Russia patent EA 008223 related to the group of inventions “Matrix tablet with a basis for the prolonged release of trimetazidine” due to the fact that the group of inventions according to the independent claim 1 of the contested patent does not meet the condition of patentability “novelty”. October 20, 2010 the Moscow Arbitration Court decided in favor of Sojuzpatent’s client company “RICHTER GEDEON NYRT” (Hungary) (third person) to refuse to satisfy the statement of claim of Les Laboratoires Servier (France) against Federal Service for Intellectual Property, Patents and Trademarks (RUPTO) about the invalidation in part of Russia patent EA 008223 related to the group of inventions “Matrix tablet with a basis for the prolonged release of trimetazidine” due to the fact that the group of inventions according to the independent claim 1 of the contested patent does not meet the condition of patentability “novelty”.
Oct 3 2010
October 3, 2010 – October 6, 2010 42nd World Intellectual Property Congress was held in Paris (France) by the International Association for the Protection of Intellectual Property (AIPPI). The employees of Sojuzpatent Dr. Zalesov (President of the Russian National Group of AIPPI) and Dr. Sobolev (Executive Secretary of the Russian National Group of AIPPI) participated in this Congress. October 3, 2010 – October 6, 2010 42nd World Intellectual Property Congress was held in Paris (France) by the International Association for the Protection of Intellectual Property (AIPPI). The employees of Sojuzpatent Dr. Zalesov (President of the Russian National Group of AIPPI) and Dr. Sobolev (Executive Secretary of the Russian National Group of AIPPI) participated in this Congress.
Sep 29 2010
September 29, 2010 the Chamber for Patent Disputes of the Federal Service for Intellectual Property, Patents and Trademarks decided to satisfy the objection of Sojuzpatent, acting on behalf of its client LLC “Interface Russia”, against providing legal protection for the trademark under registration certificate No 381447 in respect of part of the goods for individualization of which the trademark had been registered. September 29, 2010 the Chamber for Patent Disputes of the Federal Service for Intellectual Property, Patents and Trademarks decided to satisfy the objection of Sojuzpatent, acting on behalf of its client LLC “Interface Russia”, against providing legal protection for the trademark under registration certificate No 381447 in respect of part of the goods for individualization of which the trademark had been registered.
Aug 19 2010
August 19, 2010 the Moscow Arbitration Court ruled in favor of Sojuzpatent’s client LLC “Valenta-Intellect” and invalidated the Decision of the Federal Service for Intellectual Property, Patents and Trademarks (Rospatent), under which Rospatent invalidated in the territory of the Russian Federation the Eurasian patent No 10649, patent holder of which, among others, is LLC “Valenta-Intellect”. August 19, 2010 the Moscow Arbitration Court ruled in favor of Sojuzpatent’s client LLC “Valenta-Intellect” and invalidated the Decision of the Federal Service for Intellectual Property, Patents and Trademarks (Rospatent), under which Rospatent invalidated in the territory of the Russian Federation the Eurasian patent No 10649, patent holder of which, among others, is LLC “Valenta-Intellect”.
Aug 17 2010
June 30, 2010 - The Appeal Arbitration Court for Ninth Circuit decided in favor of Sojuzpatent’s client company Soremartec SA (Belgium) (plaintiff) with regard to the case of violation of exclusive rights to the Trademark Registration RF 368144. By this Decision the Appeal Arbitration Court for Ninth Circuit affirmed the Decision of the Moscow Arbitration Court of March 29, 2010 adopted with regard to the same case, according to which: - in favor of Soremartec S.A. the compensation in the amount of 2,000,000 (two million) rubles is exacted; - the defendants are forbidden to use the Trademark Registration 368144 in the way of producing, introducing into the civil turnover and selling confectionery "Waffles "Tribelli" with their packing and / or individually wrapping designation similar to the Trademark Registration 368144. The defendant used on the package of the confectionery products "Waffles" Tribelli" designation similar to the Trademark Registration 368144, which was used by the right holder Soremartec SA inter alia on the packages of sweets "Raffaello". June 30, 2010 - The Appeal Arbitration Court for Ninth Circuit decided in favor of Sojuzpatent’s client company Soremartec SA (Belgium) (plaintiff) with regard to the case of violation of exclusive rights to the Trademark Registration RF 368144. By this Decision the Appeal Arbitration Court for Ninth Circuit affirmed the Decision of the Moscow Arbitration Court of March 29, 2010 adopted with regard to the same case, according to which: - in favor of Soremartec S.A. the compensation in the amount of 2,000,000 (two million) rubles is exacted; - the defendants are forbidden to use the Trademark Registration 368144 in the way of producing, introducing into the civil turnover and selling confectionery "Waffles "Tribelli" with their packing and / or individually wrapping designation similar to the Trademark Registration 368144. The defendant used on the package of the confectionery products "Waffles" Tribelli" designation similar to the Trademark Registration 368144, which was used by the right holder Soremartec SA inter alia on the packages of sweets "Raffaello".
Aug 13 2010
August 13, 2010 the Moscow Arbitration Court ruled in favor of the client Sojuzpatent company “Akzo Nobel Chemicals B.V.” (Netherlands) and invalidated the decision of the Federal Service for Intellectual Property, Patents and Trademarks (Rospatent), according to which the legal protection of the international trademark 735647 “Rexolin” is prematurely stopped in the territory of the Russian Federation due to its nonuse. In court the client of Sojuzpatent was represented by attorneys of Sojuzpatent the Deputy General Director Head of Legal Department Dr. Zalesov and lawyer Ms. Bednova. August 13, 2010 the Moscow Arbitration Court ruled in favor of the client Sojuzpatent company “Akzo Nobel Chemicals B.V.” (Netherlands) and invalidated the decision of the Federal Service for Intellectual Property, Patents and Trademarks (Rospatent), according to which the legal protection of the international trademark 735647 “Rexolin” is prematurely stopped in the territory of the Russian Federation due to its nonuse. In court the client of Sojuzpatent was represented by attorneys of Sojuzpatent the Deputy General Director Head of Legal Department Dr. Zalesov and lawyer Ms. Bednova.
Aug 9 2010
August 9, 2010 The Arbitration Court of Rostov Region approved the Amicable Agreement between Sojuzpatent’s client SOREMARTEC S.A. (Belgium) and the Defendants in the case individual entrepreneur Belokobylskaya V.P. and LLC “Russprodukt”. Terms and conditions of this Amicable Agreement fully meet the interests of SOREMARTEC S.A. and are directed to protect the exclusive rights of SOREMARTEC S.A. for the trademark under international registration No 798984. August 9, 2010 The Arbitration Court of Rostov Region approved the Amicable Agreement between Sojuzpatent’s client SOREMARTEC S.A. (Belgium) and the Defendants in the case individual entrepreneur Belokobylskaya V.P. and LLC “Russprodukt”. Terms and conditions of this Amicable Agreement fully meet the interests of SOREMARTEC S.A. and are directed to protect the exclusive rights of SOREMARTEC S.A. for the trademark under international registration No 798984.
Jul 9 2010
July 9, 2010 Taganskiy District Court of Moscow ruled in favor of Sojuzpatent’s client LLC “KIA Motors RUS” and dismissed Mr. Ulanov’s claim against LLC “KIA Motors RUS” regarding the protection of Mr. Ulanov’s exclusive rights for the utility model “Device for transferring electrical signals and for return of blinker indicator’s lever” protected by patent RU 83976. Decision of Taganskiy District Court of Moscow rejected the claims of Mr. Ulanov (Plaintiff) according to which the Plaintiff asked the Court to oblige LLC “KIA Motors RUS” to stop using in its business activity product which contained, according to the Plaintiff’s opinion, each feature of utility model, “Device for transferring electrical signals and for return of blinker indicator’s lever” cited in independent claim of the formula of patent RU 83976, and also asked the Court to oblige LLC “KIA Motors RUS” to conclude with him license agreement. July 9, 2010 Taganskiy District Court of Moscow ruled in favor of Sojuzpatent’s client LLC “KIA Motors RUS” and dismissed Mr. Ulanov’s claim against LLC “KIA Motors RUS” regarding the protection of Mr. Ulanov’s exclusive rights for the utility model “Device for transferring electrical signals and for return of blinker indicator’s lever” protected by patent RU 83976. Decision of Taganskiy District Court of Moscow rejected the claims of Mr. Ulanov (Plaintiff) according to which the Plaintiff asked the Court to oblige LLC “KIA Motors RUS” to stop using in its business activity product which contained, according to the Plaintiff’s opinion, each feature of utility model, “Device for transferring electrical signals and for return of blinker indicator’s lever” cited in independent claim of the formula of patent RU 83976, and also asked the Court to oblige LLC “KIA Motors RUS” to conclude with him license agreement.
Apr 21 2010
April 21, 2010 – The Federal Arbitration Court of Moscow Circuit affirmed the Resolution of the Appeal Arbitration Court for Ninth Circuit taken in favor of the client company “Dr. Ing. h.c. F. Porsche Aktiengesellschaft" (the Federal Republic of Germany) (plaintiff) with regard to the case of violation of exclusive rights to the international trademark "Cayenne" IR 723642 and IR 730258. The defendant used the domain name "cayenneclub.ru" for offering for sale spare parts for Porsche Cayenne cars. The Court put an injunction on the defendant against the use of the trademarks belonging to "Dr. Ing. h.c. F. Porsche Aktiengesellschaft" in administering the domain "cayenneclub.ru". April 21, 2010 – The Federal Arbitration Court of Moscow Circuit affirmed the Resolution of the Appeal Arbitration Court for Ninth Circuit taken in favor of the client company “Dr. Ing. h.c. F. Porsche Aktiengesellschaft" (the Federal Republic of Germany) (plaintiff) with regard to the case of violation of exclusive rights to the international trademark "Cayenne" IR 723642 and IR 730258. The defendant used the domain name "cayenneclub.ru" for offering for sale spare parts for Porsche Cayenne cars. The Court put an injunction on the defendant against the use of the trademarks belonging to "Dr. Ing. h.c. F. Porsche Aktiengesellschaft" in administering the domain "cayenneclub.ru".
Mar 17 2010
March 17 2010 - The St. Petersburg Arbitration Court decided in favor of Sojuzpatent’s client DELSEY (France) (plaintiff), with regard to the case of infringement of exclusive rights for the trademark ”DELSEY” IR 487132. In accordance with this Decision it is forbidden for the defendant to use the trademark IR 487132 in the way of offering for sale and selling bags labeled ”DELSEY”, except offering for sale and selling bags, which were introduced into the civil turnover in the territory of the Russian Federation by DELSEY or with its consent; - in favor of DELSEY compensation in the amount of 110,000 (one hundred ten thousand) rubles is to be collected from the defendant for the infringement of the exclusive rights for the trademark IR 487132. March 17 2010 - The St. Petersburg Arbitration Court decided in favor of Sojuzpatent’s client DELSEY (France) (plaintiff), with regard to the case of infringement of exclusive rights for the trademark ”DELSEY” IR 487132. In accordance with this Decision it is forbidden for the defendant to use the trademark IR 487132 in the way of offering for sale and selling bags labeled ”DELSEY”, except offering for sale and selling bags, which were introduced into the civil turnover in the territory of the Russian Federation by DELSEY or with its consent; - in favor of DELSEY compensation in the amount of 110,000 (one hundred ten thousand) rubles is to be collected from the defendant for the infringement of the exclusive rights for the trademark IR 487132.
Pages:  ...  2    3    4    5    6    7    8    9    10    11    12    13    14  »

Legal address:
5/2, Il`inka str.,
Moscow, Russia, 109012

Post address:
h.13, b.5, Myasnitskaya str.
Moscow, Russia, 101000

Phones:
+7 (495) 221-88-80, 221-88-81

Faxes:
+7 (495) 221-88-85, 221-88-86

E-mail:
info@sojuzpatent.com

Company news
May 25 2017

Sojuzpatent’s team of ten professionals took part in the 139th INTA Annual Meeting in Barcelona, Spain. During the event, Sojuzpatent hosted a booth at the Convention Center.

Read more
Apr 28 2017

The Supreme Court of the Russian Federation refused to transfer the cassation appeal of the offender to the Judicial Board for Economic Disputes, thereby supporting the position of Sojuzpatent’s client - Renault S.A.S. (France)

Read more
Nov 29 2016

On November 28, 2016, the Presidium of the IP Court canceled the decision of the first instance in the case SIP-70/2016 and sent the case back for a new trial by a different panel of judges. The Presidium agreed with the arguments of Golden Lady Company S.p.A that the conclusions of the court of the first instance contradicted to the facts and case materials and that additional evidence, provided by the parties after administrative procedure, should be also taken into consideration by court. Also, the Presidium stated, that a Power of Attorney should clearly indicate the date when it is signed, and if a Notary just acknowledges the authentic signature, but does not confirm that this signature was put in his presence, the date of notarial certification cannot be the date of PoA. A PoA without a date is void. A power of attorney, having two different dates on it should be also considered void.

Read more

Read all news »