News

Apr 4 2013
Arbitration Court Rules in Favor of Sojuzpatents client SOREMARTEC S.A. (Belgium)

The Moscow Arbitration Court obliged “AgroPromTorg” LLC to stop the infringement of the intellectual property rights of Sojuzpatent’s client SOREMARTEC S.A.

Mar 6 2013
Arbitration Court Rules in Favor of Sojuzpatents client SOREMARTEC S.A. (Belgium)

The Moscow Arbitration Court obliged JSC “Kogalnitskiy molokozavod” to stop the infringement of Sojuzpatent’s client SOREMARTECS.A.’s rights for the trademark “

Jan 23 2013
The Board of the Chamber for Patent Disputes stopped proceedings regarding the objection of the validity of patent filed by the patent attorneys of "Sojuzpatent"

Because of the termination of the Eurasian patent No. 5008 the Board of the Chamber for Patent Disputes stopped proceedings regarding the objection of the validity of this patent filed by the patent attorneys of "Sojuzpatent" 

Nov 28 2012
Arbitration Court Rules in Favor of Sojuzpatents client SOREMARTEC S.A.

The Moscow Arbitration Court ruled in favor of Sojuzpatent’s client – SOREMARTEC S.A. (Belgium) (Plaintiff).

Nov 26 2012
Arbitration Court Rules in Favor of Sojuzpatents client Hess Family Estates AG

Moscow Arbitration Court ruled in favor of Sojuzpatent’s client – Hess Family Estates AG (Switzerland) 

Oct 30 2012
Moscow Arbitration Court Rules in Favor of Sojuzpatents Client Albion Co., Ltd.

The Moscow Arbitration Court ruled in favor of Sojuzpatent’s client - Albion Co., Ltd. (Japan) and rejected the claims of the plaintiff, Lornamid, Inc. (USA), the owner of the Russian trademark No. 87346, to consider illegal the decision of the Russian Patent Office on the early termination of legal protection of the said trademark regarding all the services of class 03 of the Nice Classification.

 

Oct 10 2012
Chamber for Patent Disputes Decides in Favor of Sojuzpatents Client JSC "Veropharm" on Patent Invalidation Case

The Chamber for Patent Disputes of the Federal Service for Intellectual Property decided in favor of Sojuzpatent’s client - JSC "Veropharm" in a patent invalidation case and recognized the Russian Federation patent No. 2134123 "Pharmaceutical composition for injection, method of preparation and perfusion solution based on pharmaceutical composition" partially invalid.

Sep 26 2012
Moscow Arbitration Court Rules in Favour of Sojuzpatents Client Ferrero S.P.A. (Italy)

The Moscow Arbitration Court ruled in favour of Sojuzpatent’s client - Ferrero S.P.A. (Italy) (plaintiff). The court obligated the defendants LLC "SLASTY" and LLC "SWEET LINK" to stop importing to Russia and selling confectionery «Diamond».

Sep 10 2012
Arbitration Appeal Court Rules in Favour of Sojuzpatents Client OBI GmbH & Co. Deutschland KG (Germany)

The Ninth Arbitration Appeal Court  ruled in favour of Sojuzpatent’s client - OBI GmbH & Co. Deutschland KG (Germany) (plaintiff) in an infringement case with regard to the trademark «OBI» under the international registration No. 646003.

Sep 10 2012
Federal Arbitration Court of Moscow District Rules in Favour of Sojuzpatents Client JSC "Gedeon Richter"

Federal Arbitration Court of Moscow District ruled in favour of Sojuzpatent’s client - JSC "Gedeon Richter" (defendant) in a patent infringement case.

Sep 10 2012
Sojuzpatents Head of Trademark Department Mrs. Tatiana V. Petrova Co-Authors Article in INTA Bulletin

Sojuzpatent’s Head of Trademark Department Mrs. Tatiana Petrova co-authored an article in September’s INTA Bulletin titled "RUSSIA: As Russia Joins the WTO, It Streamlines Official Fees and Is Expected to Improve IP Protection"

Sep 6 2012
Sojuzpatent Makes Presentation to Chinese Business Community

Dr. Aleksey Zalesov made a presentation “Invalidation of Patent in Russia as an Effective Defense: Current situation and Prospects” for Chinese manufacturers in Beijing.

Aug 16 2012
Cassation Appeal Court Board of Astana City Rules in Favour of Sojuzpatents Client Richter Gedeon Nyrt (Hungary)

 The Cassation Appeal Court Board of AstanaCity ruled in favour of Sojuzpatent’s client – Richter Gedeon Nyrt (Hungary). According to the said decision, the court recognized as illegal the refusal of the Appeal Board of the Intellectual Property Right Committee of the Ministry of Justice of the Republic of Kazakhstan to consider the opposition of Sojuzpatent (acting on behalf of Richter Gedeon Nyrt) against the validity of the Eurasian patent No. 008223 in the territory of the Republic of Kazakhstan.

Aug 8 2012
Arbitration Court of Kirov Region Rules in Favour of Sojuzpatents Client JSC UOLL

On August 8, 2012, the Arbitration Court of Kirov Region took a decision in favour of Sojuzpatent’s client – JSC “UOLL” (plaintiff) in a utility model infringement case. 

Aug 7 2012
Chamber for Patent Disputes Takes Decision in Favour of Sojuzpatents Client LLC Kariba on Trademark TIKIBAR

On August 7, 2012, the Chamber for Patent Disputes of the Federal Service for Intellectual Property took a decision in favour of Sojuzpatent’s client – LLC “Kariba” with regard to the trademark “TIKIBAR”. 

Aug 7 2012
Chamber for Patent Disputes Takes Decision in Favour of Sojuzpatents Client LLC Kariba on Trademark TIKI BAR

On August 7, 2012, the Chamber for Patent Disputes of the Federal Service for Intellectual Property took a decision in favour of Sojuzpatent’s client – LLC “Kariba” with regard to the trademark “TIKIBAR”.

Jul 31 2012
Arbitration Appeal Court Rules in Favour of Sojuzpatents Client Soremartec S.A. (Belgium) on Trademark Δ

On July 31, 2012, the Tenth Arbitration Appeal Court of Moscow ruled in favour of Sojuzpatent’s client - Soremartec S.A.(Belgium) (plaintiff) in an infringement case with regard to the trademark “”.

Jun 18 2012
Chamber for Patent Disputes Takes Decision in Favour of Sojuzpatents Client Ghan and Lee Pharmaceutical Ltd. (China)

On June 18, 2012, the Chamber for Patent Disputes of the Federal Service for Intellectual Property took a decision in favour of Sojuzpatent’s client – Ghan and Lee Pharmaceutical Ltd. (China) in a patent invalidation case.

May 25 2012
Chamber for Patent Disputes Takes Decision in Favour of Sojuzpatents Client PIGEON CORPORATION (Japan)

On May 25, 2012, the Chamber for Patent Disputes of the Federal Service for Intellectual Property took a decision in favour of Sojuzpatent’s client - PIGEON CORPORATION (Japan) in a patent invalidation case.

May 23 2012
Arbitration Appeal Court Rules in Favour of Sojuzpatents Client "Gedeon Richter"

On May 23, 2012, the Ninth Arbitration Appeal Court of Moscow ruled in favour of Sojuzpatent’s client JSC "Gedeon Richter" (defendant) in a patent infringement case.

Pages:  1    2    3    4    5    6    7    8    9    10    11  

Legal address:
5/2, Il`inka str.,
Moscow, Russia, 109012

Post address:
h.13, b.5, Myasnitskaya str.
Moscow, Russia, 101000

Phones:
+7 (495) 221-88-80, 221-88-81

Faxes:
+7 (495) 221-88-85, 221-88-86

E-mail:
info@sojuzpatent.com

Company news
May 25 2017

Sojuzpatent’s team of ten professionals took part in the 139th INTA Annual Meeting in Barcelona, Spain. During the event, Sojuzpatent hosted a booth at the Convention Center.

Read more
Apr 28 2017

The Supreme Court of the Russian Federation refused to transfer the cassation appeal of the offender to the Judicial Board for Economic Disputes, thereby supporting the position of Sojuzpatent’s client - Renault S.A.S. (France)

Read more
Nov 29 2016

On November 28, 2016, the Presidium of the IP Court canceled the decision of the first instance in the case SIP-70/2016 and sent the case back for a new trial by a different panel of judges. The Presidium agreed with the arguments of Golden Lady Company S.p.A that the conclusions of the court of the first instance contradicted to the facts and case materials and that additional evidence, provided by the parties after administrative procedure, should be also taken into consideration by court. Also, the Presidium stated, that a Power of Attorney should clearly indicate the date when it is signed, and if a Notary just acknowledges the authentic signature, but does not confirm that this signature was put in his presence, the date of notarial certification cannot be the date of PoA. A PoA without a date is void. A power of attorney, having two different dates on it should be also considered void.

Read more

Read all news