+7 (495) 221-88-80, 221-88-81
The Arbitration Court of Moscow Region ruled in favor of Sojuzpatent’s client - CJSC "Crocus"in a trademark infringement case with regard to the Russian trademark "CROCUS" No. 345279 and company name CJSC "CROCUS".
The Moscow Arbitration Court ruled in favor of Sojuzpatent’s Client - JSC "VEROPHARM" in patent No 2134123 invalidation case.
The Court for Intellectual Property Rights ruled in favor of Sojuzpatent’s client - Ashley Furniture Industries, Inc. (USA) in a dispute on early termination of legal protection of combined Russian trademark with the verbal element «ASHLEY» No. 400542 regarding goods of class 20 of the Nice Classification indicated in the trademark due to its non-use.
The State Court of Kiev Ruled in Favor of Sojuzpatent’s client – Ghan and Lee Pharmaceuticals Ltd. (China) in the Ukrainian patent ¹ 79477 invalidation case. The court satisfied the claims of Ghan and Lee Pharmaceuticals Ltd. and recognized the Ukrainian patent No. 79477 (patent holder - Sanofi-Aventis Deutschland GmbH) completely invalid.
The Court for Intellectual Property Rights ruled in favour of Sojuzpatent’s client – NEURIM PHARMACEUTICALS (1991) LTD (Israel) in a case on recognition of a patent application withdrawn.
Sojuzpatent's Deputy Managing Partner and Head of the Legal Department Dr. Aleksey V. Zalesov has been reelected for two year period as the President of the Russian National Group of the AIPPI.
The Court for Intellectual Property Rights ruled in favour of Sojuzpatent’s client – SOREMARTEC S.A. (Belgium) in a trademark preterm termination case with regard to the trademark “ÐÀÔÔÀÝËËÎ” under the Russian registration No. 395732.
The Ninth Arbitration Appeal Court ruled in favour of Sojuzpatent’s client – Ghan and Lee Pharmaceutical Ltd. (China) in a patent invalidation case with regard to the Russian patent “Acid insulinic preparations with the heightened stability” No. 2313362.
The Moscow Arbitration Court adopted in favour of Sojuzpatent’s client – AKZO NOBEL COATINGS INTERNATIONAL (Netherlands) the renunciation of the suit and ceased the court proceedings in a case regarding preterm termination of the trademark under the international registration No. 876106 of the company Rautakesko Oy due to the conclusion of a settlement agreement between Sojuzpatent’s client and the trademark owner.
The Moscow Arbitration Court approved a settlement agreement in favour of Sojuzpatent’s client – LLC “ZELDIS” in a trademark infringement case with regard to the Russian trademark of LLC “ZELDIS” No. 430477 “Loshadinaya Sila”.
The Moscow Arbitration Court approved a settlement agreement on the use of the trademark “Raffaello” concluded between the rightholder - Sojuzpatent’s client SOREMARTEC S.A. (Belgium) and Mossa Distribution LLC. The Agreement meets the interests of SOREMARTEC S.A.
The Ninth Arbitration Appeal Court satisfied the application submitted by Sojuzpatent in the interests of its client - TELEFONAKTIEBOLAGET LM ERICSSON S.A. and applied the preliminary injunction regarding TMC RUS LLC in a patent infringement case.
The Court for Intellectual Property Rights Acting as a Cassation court upheld the invalidation of the Russian Federation patent ¹ 2223555, which meets the interests of Sojuzpatent’s client – TEVA LLC.
Sojuzpatent’s Head of Litigation Practice Dr. Aleksey Zalesov, being the President of the Russian National AIPPI Group, participated in AIPPI Forum & ExCo in Helsinki.
Sojuzpatent's delegation participated in the International Trademark Association (INTA) 135th Annual Meeting in Dallas, Texas on May 5-8th, 2013.
Sojuzpatent partnered the International Forum "Intellectual Property - XXI Century" held by the Institute of State and Law of the Russian Academy of Science.
Sojuzpatent’s Head of Litigation Practice Dr. Aleksey Zalesov spoke at an International Conference organized by the Russian Supreme Arbitration Court and the Court for Intellectual Property Rights.
Legal address:5/2, Il`inka str., Moscow, Russia, 109012
Post address: h.13, b.5, Myasnitskaya str.Moscow, Russia, 101000
Phones:+7 (495) 221-88-80, 221-88-81
Faxes:+7 (495) 221-88-85, 221-88-86
Sojuzpatent’s team of ten professionals took part in the 139th INTA Annual Meeting in Barcelona, Spain. During the event, Sojuzpatent hosted a booth at the Convention Center.
The Supreme Court of the Russian Federation refused to transfer the cassation appeal of the offender to the Judicial Board for Economic Disputes, thereby supporting the position of Sojuzpatent’s client - Renault S.A.S. (France)
On November 28, 2016, the Presidium of the IP Court canceled the decision of the first instance in the case SIP-70/2016 and sent the case back for a new trial by a different panel of judges. The Presidium agreed with the arguments of Golden Lady Company S.p.A that the conclusions of the court of the first instance contradicted to the facts and case materials and that additional evidence, provided by the parties after administrative procedure, should be also taken into consideration by court. Also, the Presidium stated, that a Power of Attorney should clearly indicate the date when it is signed, and if a Notary just acknowledges the authentic signature, but does not confirm that this signature was put in his presence, the date of notarial certification cannot be the date of PoA. A PoA without a date is void. A power of attorney, having two different dates on it should be also considered void.
Read all news »